Imaging apparatus and monitoring system

ABSTRACT

An imaging apparatus includes an image sensor, an angle controller configured to change an angle between a plane orthogonal to an optical axis of an imaging optical system and an imaging plane of the image sensor, an illuminator; and an illumination controller configured to change an optical axis direction of the illuminator based on the angle.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/519,265, filed on Jul. 23, 2019, which claims the benefit of andpriority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-142871, filed on Jul.30, 2018, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein intheir entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an imaging apparatus having anilluminator.

Description of the Related Art

For example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. (“JP”) 11-281879 discloses animaging apparatus that can provide so-called tilt imaging that inclinesan optical axis of a camera lens to an image sensor, when an objectplane inclines to a principal plane of the lens o as to maintain deep adepth of field even if the camera lens uses a telephoto lens with abright F-number. For example, JP 2013-41282discloses a network cameraincluding an illuminator, such as an infrared LED, in order to obtain aclear object image even at a low illuminance at night or the like.

However, the following problem occurs when the illuminator disclosed inJP 2013-41282 is applied to the imaging apparatus that provides the tiltimaging as disclosed in JP 11-281879 in order to improve the visibilityat the low illuminance. In general, in the tilt imaging, the objectplane inclines to the principal plane of the camera lens. In otherwords, the distance from the imaging apparatus to the object differswithin an angle of view of the image sensor. Thus, as in the networkcamera disclosed in JP 2013-41282, when the optical axis of the lens andthe optical axis of the illuminator coincide with each other, the objecthas an uneven luminance distribution within an angle of view and thecaptured image quality is degraded. In particular, a large unevenluminance distribution is likely to cause clipped whites and crashedshadows in the captured image.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an imaging apparatus and a monitoringsystem, each of which can improve the captured image quality by reducingan uneven luminance distribution of an object in tilt imaging using anilluminator.

An imaging apparatus according to one aspect of the present inventionincludes an image sensor, an angle controller configured to change anangle between a plane orthogonal to an optical axis of an imagingoptical system and an imaging plane of the image sensor, an illuminator;and an illumination controller configured to change an optical axisdirection of the illuminator based on the angle. A monitoring systemincluding the above imaging apparatus also constitutes another aspect ofthe present invention.

Further features of the present invention will become apparent from thefollowing description of exemplary embodiments with reference to theattached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an imaging apparatus according to a firstembodiment.

FIG. 2 is an explanatory view of a focus plane in tilt imaging accordingto the first embodiment.

FIGS. 3A and 3B are illumination distribution views of an object plane.

FIG. 4 illuminates a relationship between an image sensor and anillumination element in tilt imaging according to the first embodiment.

FIG. 5 is an illuminance distribution diagram of the object planeaccording to the first embodiment.

FIG. 6 is an illuminance distribution diagram of the object plane when asecond angle in the first embodiment is changed.

FIGS. 7A and 7B are explanatory diagrams of the object plane accordingto the first embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an imaging apparatus according to a secondembodiment.

FIGS. 9A and 9B are illumination distribution diagrams of the objectplane according to the second embodiment.

FIGS. 10A and 10B are a block diagram of an imaging apparatus accordingto a third embodiment and illustrate a relationship between an imagesensor and an illumination element in tilt imaging.

FIGS. 11A and 11B are a light intensity distribution and an illuminancedistribution diagram for each ratio of the current flowing in theplurality of illumination elements according to the third embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a variation of the imaging apparatus according to the thirdembodiment.

FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a monitoring system according to a fourthembodiment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the accompanying drawings, a description will be givenof embodiments according to the present invention. In respectivefigures, corresponding elements will be designated by the same referencenumerals, and a duplicate description thereof will be omitted.

First Embodiment

Referring now to FIG. 1, a description will be given of an imagingapparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention. FIG.1 is a block diagram of an imaging apparatus 100 according to thisembodiment. The imaging apparatus 100 includes an imaging optical system(image capturing optical system) 101, an illumination element(illuminator) 102, an illumination direction control mechanism(illumination controller) 103, an image sensor (solid-state image pickupelement) 104, and a tilt mechanism (angle controller) 105, and acontroller 106. The controller 106 controls each component in the imageapparatus 100. The imaging optical system 101 may be of a removableinterchangeable lens type.

The image sensor 104 is a CMOS sensor or a CCD sensor, andphotoelectrically converts an object image (optical image) formedthrough the imaging optical system 101. The illumination element 102emits light having a wavelength to which the image sensor 104 issensitive. For example, when the image sensor 104 is made of silicon(Si), the illumination element 102 may use an LED made of a compoundsemiconductor, such as AlGaAs and InGaN. The controller 106 controlsturning on and off of the illumination element 102 and the lightintensity emitted from the illumination element 102. The illuminationdirection control mechanism 103 controls the orientation of theillumination element 102 by rotating the illumination element 102. Theillumination direction control mechanism 103 includes a motor and agear. The controller 106 can rotate the illumination element 102 on theXZ plane by controlling the current flowing through the motor of theillumination direction control mechanism 103. The tilt mechanism 105 canrotate the orientation of the image sensor 104 in the XZ plane.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a focus plane 107 in the tilt imaging will bedescribed. FIG. 2 is an explanatory view of the focus plane 107 in thetilt imaging. According to the shine proofing principle, the lightincident surface (imaging plane) of the image sensor 104, the principalplane 108 (surface orthogonal to the optical axis 109) of the imagingoptical system 101, and the focus plane 107 intersects with a straightline L that extends in the Y axis direction. Thus, the focus plane 107inclines to the principal plane 108 of the imaging optical system 101 inthe XZ plane. In FIG. 2, reference numeral 109 denotes an optical axisof the imaging optical system 101.

Next, assume that the optical axis 110 of the illumination element 102accords with the optical axis 109 of the imaging optical system 101 inthe imaging apparatus 100 in which the focus plane 107 inclines to theprincipal plane 108 of the imaging optical system 101, as disclosed inthe prior art, such as JP 2013-41282. FIG. 3A is an illuminancedistribution diagram of the focus plane 107 (object plane) when theoptical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 coincides with theoptical axis 109 of the imaging optical system 101 in tilt imaging. InFIG. 3A, the abscissa axis denotes the image height, and the ordinateaxis denotes the illuminance (illuminance relative value). Asillustrated in FIG. 3A, the illuminance largely differs according to theimage heights, and a large uneven illuminance occurs at the angle ofview. This is because the distance between the illumination element 102and the focus plane 107 is largely different within the angle of view ofthe imaging apparatus 100 in tilt imaging. Since the illuminance is highat a position where the distance between the illumination element 102and the focus plane 107 is close (in an area 107A in FIG. 2), and low atthe position where the distance between the illumination element 102 andthe focus plane 107 is long (FIG. 2) (in an area 107B), an unevenilluminance occurs. As a result, the uneven illuminance of the imageoccurs and the visibility reduces.

FIG. 3B is, as a comparative example, an illuminance distributiondiagram where the tilt imaging is not performed. As illustrated in FIG.3B, the same uneven illuminance occurs even when the tilt imaging is notperformed. However, where the tilt imaging is not performed, an in-focusrange R is narrow in which the object is in focus. Thus, the unevenilluminance is small within the in-focus range. In other words, wherethe tilt imaging is not performed, the visibility reduces due to theuneven illuminance only in the area where the object image is blurredbecause the object is not in focus.

In general, for an imaging apparatus for an observation, it is a bigissue whether the blur degree is beautiful or not even in the area wherethe object image is blurred. Thus, the visibility decrease caused by theuneven illuminance becomes an issue. However, in the imaging apparatusfor a recognition such as monitoring purposes, the result that theobject is too blurred to be recognized does not change in an area wherethe object image is blurred, regardless of the uneven illuminance. Thus,in the area where the object image is blurred, the problematicallyreduced visibility caused by the uneven illuminance does not frequentlyoccur. Hence, the problematically reduced visibility of the object imagecaused by the uneven illuminance does not frequently occur when theimaging apparatus for the recognition does not perform the tilt imaging.The present invention suppresses the problematically reduced visibilityof the object image in the imaging apparatus for the recognition due tothe uneven illuminance in the tilt imaging. Hereinafter, this embodimentwill be specifically described.

Referring now to FIG. 4, a description will be given of a relationshipbetween the image sensor 104 and the illumination element 102 in thetilt imaging using the imaging apparatus 100. FIG. 4 illustrates arelationship between the image sensor 104 and the illumination element102 in the tilt imaging, or a relationship among the light incidentsurface (imaging plane) of the image sensor 104, the principal plane 108of the imaging optical system 101, the focus plane 107, and the opticalaxis 110 of the illumination element 102. The direction of the opticalaxis 110 of the illumination element 102 is the center of gravitydirection of the light intensity distribution emitted from theillumination element 102.

As illustrated in FIG. 4, the light incident surface of the image sensor104 rotates counterclockwise with the Y axis as the rotation center andbased on the principal plane 108 of the imaging optical system 101. Theimaging apparatus 100 according to this embodiment sets the optical axis110 of the illumination element 102 to the rotation center which is theY axis and rotates it counterclockwise based on the optical axis 109 ofthe imaging optical system 101 as the light incident surface of theimage sensor 104 rotates. Now assume that an angle (tilt angle) θ1formed between the principal plane 108 of the imaging optical system 101and the light incident surface of the image sensor 104 is a first angle111. In addition, assume that an angle θ2 formed between the opticalaxis 110 of the illumination element 102 and the optical axis 109 of theimaging optical system 101 is a second angle 112. At this time, a codeof the first angle 111 (the rotation direction of the light incidentsurface of the image sensor 104 based on the principal plane 108 of theimaging optical system 101) and a code of the second angle 112 (therotation direction of the optical axis 110 of the illumination element102 based on the optical axis 109 of the imaging optical system 101)coincide with each other. In other words, the rotation direction of thefirst angle 111 (counterclockwise direction in FIG. 4) and the rotationdirection of the second angle 112 (counterclockwise direction) coincidewith each other. Hence, the uneven illuminance can be reduced bychanging (rotating) the direction of the optical axis 110 of theillumination element 102 in accordance with the tilt direction of theimage sensor 104.

Referring now to FIG. 5, a description will be given of the illuminancedistribution of each of the focus plane 107 (object plane) when theoptical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 is rotated relative tothe optical axis 109 of the imaging optical system 101 and when theoptical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 is not rotated. FIG. 5is an illuminance distribution diagram of the focus plane 107 (objectplane) when the optical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 isrotated relative to the optical axis 109 of the imaging optical system101 and when the optical axis 110 is not rotated. In FIG. 5, theabscissa axis represents the image height, and the ordinate axisrepresents the illuminance (logarithm). In FIG. 5, a solid linerepresents the illuminance distribution when the optical axis 110 of theillumination element 102 is rotated as in this embodiment, and a brokenline represents the illuminance distribution when the light axis 110 ofthe illumination element 102 is not rotated as in a comparative example.As illustrated in FIG. 5, the solid line changes more gently than thebroken line. Hence, the uneven illuminance can be reduced by rotatingthe optical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 relative to theoptical axis 109 of the imaging optical system 101. The reason will bedescribed below.

As described above, the uneven illuminance in the tilt imaging is causedby the distance between the illumination element 102 and the focus plane107 that is largely different within the angle of view of the imagingapparatus 100. Thus, the uneven illuminance when the strong light isirradiated onto the position (area 107B in FIG. 4) in which the distancebetween the illumination element 102 and the focus plane 107 is long islower than that when the strong light is irradiated onto the position(area 107A in FIG. 4) in which the distance between the illuminationelement 102 and the focus plane 107 is short. In general, theillumination element 102 reflects the structure of the LED and has anorientation distribution having a strong directivity in the direction(optical axis direction) perpendicular to the surface of the LED. Hence,the uneven illuminance can be reduced by inclining the optical axis 110of the illumination element 102 in the direction in which the distancebetween the illumination element 102 and the focus plane 107 is long. Asa result, the captured image quality can be improved, and therecognition accuracy of the object can be improved.

The second angle 112 formed between the optical axis 109 of the imagingoptical system 101 and the optical axis 110 of the illumination element102 may be determined according to the first angle 111 formed betweenthe principal plane 108 of the imaging optical system 101 and the lightincident surface (imaging plane) of the image sensor 104 so as tosufficiently reduce the uneven illuminance. The second angle 112 isdetermined according to the first angle 111 so as to most reduce theuneven illuminance.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a description will be given of the illuminancedistribution of the focus plane 107 when the second angle 112 ischanged. FIG. 6 is an illuminance distribution diagram of the focusplane 107 when the second angle 112 is changed. In FIG. 6, the abscissaaxis represents the image height, and the ordinate axis represents theilluminance (logarithm). In FIG. 6, a broken line represents that theabsolute value of the second angle 112 is small, a dotted linerepresents that an absolute value of the second angle 112 is large, anda solid line represents that an absolute value of the second angle 112is intermediate between them. As illustrated in FIG. 6, as the absolutevalue of the second angle 112 is made larger, the uneven illuminancebecomes lower. In particular, when the absolute value of the secondangle 112 is made equal to or more than a half of the angle of view ofthe imaging apparatus 100, the uneven illuminance can be sufficientlyreduced.

On the other hand, as illustrated by the dotted line in FIG. 6, as theabsolute value of the second angle 112 is made excessively large, theuneven illuminance decreases, but the average illuminance within theangle of view of the imaging apparatus 100 decreases. This is because ifthe absolute value of the second angle 112 is made excessively large, alight amount emitted from the illumination element 102 to the outside ofthe angle of view of the imaging apparatus 100 increases. In particular,when the absolute value of the second angle 112 is made equal to or lessthan the angle of view of the imaging apparatus 100, a light amountemitted to the outside the angle of view of the imaging apparatus 100 isreduced.

The tilt imaging needs to control the first angle 111 in accordance withthe angle between the object plane (focus plane 107) and the principalplane 108 of the imaging optical system 101. FIGS. 7A and 7B areexplanatory diagrams of the object plane (focus plane 107). FIGS. 7A and7B illustrate the relationship among the focus plane 107, the principalplane 108, and the light incident surface (imaging plane) of the imagesensor 104 for the small absolute value of the first angle 111 and forthe large absolute value of the first angle 111, respectively.

As illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B, as the absolute value of the firstangle 111 is larger, the distance between the illumination element 102and the focal plane 107 is largely different within the angle of view ofthe imaging apparatus 100. When the absolute value of the first angle111 is small, the uneven illuminance within the angle of view does notbecome a big issue. When the absolute value of the first angle 111 issmall (when the first angle 111 is smaller than a predetermined angle),the optical axis 110 of the illumination element 102 may not be tiltedas illustrated in FIG. 7A. For example, if the absolute value of thefirst angle 111 is less than one degree, then the absolute value of thesecond angle 112 may be set to zero. In other words, when the firstangle 111 is one degree or more, the orientation of the illuminationelement 102 may be changed so that the optical axis 110 of theillumination element 102 is different from the optical axis 109 of theimaging optical system 101 as in this embodiment.

This embodiment may continuously change the second angle 112 inaccordance with the first angle 111. More specifically, the absolutevalue of the second angle 112 is made larger as the absolute value ofthe first angle 111 is larger. This can effectively reduce the unevenilluminance.

Second Embodiment

Referring now to FIG. 8, a description will be given of an imagingapparatus according to a second embodiment of the present invention.FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an imaging apparatus 200 according to thisembodiment. The image sensor 200 according to this embodiment isdifferent from the imaging apparatus 100 of the first embodimentdescribed with reference to FIG. 1 in that it includes an illuminationrange control mechanism 213 that changes the illumination range(irradiation angle range) of the illumination element 102. Theillumination range control mechanism 213 changes the illumination rangeof the illumination element 102 according to the first angle 111. Thisconfiguration can more effectively reduce the uneven illuminance on thefocus plane 107 (object plane).

Referring now to FIGS. 9A and 9B, a description will be given of theilluminance distribution on the focus plane 107 (object plane) when theillumination range of the illumination element 102 is changed and whenthe illumination range is not changed. FIGS. 9A and 9B are illuminancedistribution diagrams of the focus plane 107 when the illumination rangeof the illumination element 102 is changed and when the illuminationrange is not changed. In FIGS. 9A and 9B, the abscissa axis representsthe image height, and the ordinate axis represents the illuminance(logarithm). FIG. 9A illuminates the small absolute value of the firstangle 111 because the angle between the object plane and the principalplane 108 of the imaging optical system 101 is made small. On the otherhand, FIG. 9B illustrates the large absolute value of the first angle111 because the angle between the object plane and the principal plane108 of the imaging optical system 101 is made large.

In FIGS. 9A and 9B, a solid line represents the illumination range ofthe illumination element 102 is changed according to the first angle111. In FIGS. 9A and 9B, a broken line and a dotted line show use of theillumination element 102 used to illuminate in a constant illuminationrange regardless of the first angle 111 as in the imaging apparatus 100of the first embodiment. A broken line represents the illumination rangeof the illumination element 102 as a first illumination range, and adotted line indicates the illumination range of the illumination element102 as a second illumination range. In FIG. 9A, the solid line and thebroken line overlap each other, and in FIG. 9B, the solid line and thedotted line overlap each other.

As illustrated in FIGS. 9A and 9B, where the illumination range is notchanged (fixed) according to the first angle 111, an attempt to reducethe uneven illuminance when the absolute value of the first angle 111 issmall may increase the uneven illumination when the absolute value ofthe first angle 111 is large (broken line). On the other hand, anattempt to reduce the uneven illuminance when the absolute value of thefirst angle 111 is large increase the uneven illuminance when theabsolute value of the first angle 111 is small (dotted line).

On the other hand, when the illumination range is changed according tothe first angle 111, the uneven illuminance can be reduced regardless ofthe absolute value of the first angle 111 (solid line). Morespecifically, as the absolute value of the first angle 111 is larger,the illumination range of the illumination element 102 may be narrowed.In this embodiment, the illumination range means the full width at halfmaximum of the light intensity distribution emitted from theillumination element 102.

In order to control the illumination range of the illumination element102, an illumination optical system may be provided on the lightemission side of the illumination element 102, and part of the lenses ofthe illumination optical system may be driven in the optical axisdirection of the illumination optical system. Thereby, the focal lengthof the illumination optical system changes, and the illumination rangecan be controlled. In order to drive the lens, a motor and a gear may beused to control the current flowing through the motor.

Third Embodiment

Referring now to FIGS. 10A and 10B, a description will be given of animaging apparatus according to a third embodiment of the presentinvention. FIG. 10A is a block diagram of an imaging apparatus 300according to this embodiment, and FIG. 10B illustrates a relationshipbetween the image sensor 104 and the illumination element 102 in tiltimaging.

Each of the imaging apparatuses 100 and 200 according to the aboveembodiments includes a single illumination element 102, and rotates theillumination element 102 itself to control the illumination direction,or drives a lens as part of the illumination optical system to controlthe illumination range. On the other hand, the imaging apparatus 300according to this embodiment includes a plurality of illuminationelements 321 and 322 (first and second illumination elements) bothhaving different illumination directions and illumination ranges. Thisconfiguration enables the imaging apparatus 300 to control the effectiveillumination direction and the illumination range of the plurality ofillumination elements as a whole by controlling the current supplied toeach of the plurality of illumination elements 321 and 322. Thisconfiguration eliminates a rotation mechanism of the illuminationelement 102 and a lens drive mechanism of the illumination opticalsystem.

As illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 10B, the imaging apparatus 300 includesa plurality of illumination elements 321 and 322 both having differentillumination directions. The controller 106 can control the currentsupplied to each of the plurality of illumination elements 321 and 322.The direction of the optical axis 331 of the illumination element 321coincides with the direction of the optical axis 109 of the imagingoptical system 101. On the other hand, the optical axis 332 of theillumination element 322 inclines counterclockwise to the optical axis109 of the imaging optical system 101.

Referring to FIGS. 11A and 11B, a description will be given of arelationship between a ratio of the current flowing through theillumination element 321 and the current flowing through theillumination element 322 of the imaging apparatus 300 and a totaldistribution of the light intensities irradiated from the illuminationelements 321 and 322. FIG. 11A is a distribution diagram (lightintensity distribution diagram) of the total light intensities emittedfrom the illumination elements 321 and 322 for each ratio of thecurrents flowing through the plurality of illumination elements 321 and322 of the imaging apparatus 300. In FIG. 11A, the abscissa axisrepresents the image height, and the ordinate axis represents the lightintensity distribution (logarithm). FIG. 11B is an illuminancedistribution diagram of the focus plane 107 (object plane) for eachcurrent ratio illustrated in FIG. 11A. In FIG. 11B, the abscissa axisrepresents the image height, and the ordinate axis represents theilluminance distribution (logarithm).

A dotted line, a broken line, an alternate long and short dash line, anda solid line in FIGS. 11A and 11B represent the ratios of the currentssupplied to the illumination elements 321 and 322 are 0: 1 (322/321=0),5: 1 (322/321=0.2), 2: 1 (322/321=0.5), and 1: 1 (322/321=1). In otherwords, the ratio of the current flowing through the illumination element322 to the current flowing through the illumination element 321 isincreased in order of the dotted line, the broken line, the alternatelong and short dash line, and the solid line.

As illustrated in FIG. 11B, when the ratio of the current supplied tothe illumination element 322 to the current supplied to the illuminationelement 321 is made larger, the uneven illuminance on the focus plane107 is reduced. Thus, controlling the currents flowing through theplurality of illumination elements 321 and 322 having differentdirections can reduce the uneven illuminance on the focus plane 107. Asa result, the captured image quality can be improved.

As illustrated in FIG. 11A, when the ratio of the current flowingthrough the illumination element 322 to the current flowing through theillumination element 321 is made larger, the center of gravity(direction of the illuminator) of the light intensity distribution ofthe illumination elements 321 and 322 tilts counterclockwise. Thus, ineven the configuration of the imaging apparatus 300 illustrated in FIGS.9A and 9B, the code of the first angle 111 (rotation direction of thelight incident surface of the image sensor 104) and the code of thesecond angle 112 (the rotation direction 110 of the optical axis 110 ofthe illumination element 102) coincide with each other.

Referring now to FIG. 12, a description will be given of a variation ofthis embodiment. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram of an imagingapparatus including a plurality of illumination elements 323 and 324having different illumination ranges in addition to the illuminationelements 321 and 322 having different orientations. The orientations ofthe illumination elements 323 and 321 coincide with each other and theorientations of the illumination elements 324 and 322 coincide with eachother. In addition, the illumination ranges of the illumination elements323 and 324 are narrower than the illumination ranges of theillumination elements 321 and 322.

The configuration illustrated in FIG. 12 can control the effectiveillumination range of the illumination element in addition to theeffective orientation of the illumination element. More specifically,when the tilt imaging is not performed, the current flowing through theillumination element 321 is increased to widen the illumination rangewhile the absolute value of the second angle 112 is reduced. On theother hand, when the absolute value of the first angle 111 is large, thecurrent flowing through the illumination element 324 is increased tonarrow the illumination range while the absolute value of the secondangle 112 is maintained large. This configuration can reduce the unevenilluminance on the focus plane 107 regardless of the first angle 111.

As described above, this embodiment may narrow the illumination range ofthe illumination element, as the absolute value of the second angle 112is larger. Thus, as the angle between the optical axis of theillumination element and the optical axis 109 of the imaging opticalsystem 101 is larger, the number of required illumination elementsdecreases by arranging the plurality of illumination elements whoseillumination range is narrow. More specifically, in FIG. 12, theillumination elements 322 and 323 may be removed, and only theillumination elements 321 and 324 may be left.

Fourth Embodiment

Referring now to FIG. 13, a description will be given of a monitoringsystem according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention. FIG.13 is a block diagram of a monitoring system 400 according to thisembodiment. The monitoring system 400 includes a client device 401 andan imaging apparatus 403. The imaging apparatus 403 corresponds to anyone of the imaging apparatuses 100 to 300 according to the first tothird embodiments described above.

The client device 401 and the imaging apparatus 403 are connected in amutually communicable state via a network 402. The client device 401transmits a variety of commands to the imaging apparatus 403 so as tocontrol the imaging apparatus 403. The imaging apparatus 403 receives acommand from the client device 401, and transmits a response accordingto the command and captured image data to the client device 401. Theuser can select, via the client device 401, whether to drive the imagingapparatus 403 in a desired mode such as a depth of field priority mode.The client device 401 is an external apparatus such as a PC. The network402 includes a wired LAN or a wireless LAN. This embodiment may supplythe power to the imaging apparatus 403 via the network 402.

Hence, in each embodiment, the imaging apparatus includes the anglecontroller (tilt mechanism 105) and the illumination controller(illumination direction control mechanism 103). The angle controllerchanges an angle (tilt angle) formed between the principal plane 108 ofthe imaging optical system (imaging optical system 101) and the imagingplane (light incident surface) of the image sensor 104. The illuminationcontroller changes the optical axis direction (direction of the opticalaxis 110) of the illuminator based on the angle changed by the anglecontroller.

The illumination controller changes the optical axis direction(direction of the optical axis 110) of the illuminator so that it isdifferent from the optical axis direction (direction of the optical axis109) of the imaging optical system. The illumination controller changesthe optical axis direction of the illuminator so that it is closer tothe normal direction of the imaging plane of the image sensor. Theillumination controller changes the light axis direction of theilluminator so that the illumination intensity for the second area (area107B) is higher than the illumination intensity for the first area (area107A) on the focal plane 107 determined based on the angle changed bythe angle controller. Herein, the first area is an area in which thedistance from the illuminator is a first distance, and the second areais an area in which the distance from the illuminator is a seconddistance longer than the first distance. The angle controller may changethe angle by rotating the imaging plane of the image sensor relative tothe principal plane of the imaging optical system.

The illumination controller may change the optical axis direction of theilluminator so that a code of the first angle 111 formed between theprincipal plane of the imaging optical system and the imaging plane ofthe image sensor and a code of the second angle 112 formed between theoptical axis of the imaging optical system and the optical axis of theilluminator coincide with each other. The absolute value of the secondangle may be half or more of the angle of view of the image sensor. Theabsolute value of the second angle may be equal to or less than theangle of view of the imaging apparatus. The absolute value of the firstangle may be one degree or more.

When the absolute value of the first angle may be a first value, theillumination controller sets the absolute value of the second angle to athird value, and when the absolute value of the first angle is a secondvalue larger than the first value, the illumination controller sets theabsolute value of the second angle to a fourth value larger than thethird value. In other words, the illumination controller makes largerthe absolute value of the second angle as the absolute value of thefirst angle is larger.

The imaging apparatus may include an illumination range controller(illumination range control mechanism 213) that changes the illuminationrange of the illuminator. When the absolute value of the first angle isa first value, the illumination range controller sets the illuminationrange to the first illumination range, and when the absolute value ofthe first angle is a second value larger than the first value, theillumination range controller sets the illumination range to a secondillumination range narrower than the first illumination range. In otherwords, the illumination range controller makes narrower the illuminationrange as the absolute value of the first angle is larger. Theilluminator may include a first illumination element (illuminationelement 321) and a second illumination element (illumination element322) both having different illumination ranges. The illuminationcontroller controls the illumination range (effective illuminationrange) of the illuminator based on the ratio between the current flowingthrough the first illumination element and the current flowing throughthe second illumination element. The angle formed between the opticalaxis of the first illumination element and the optical axis of theimaging optical system is larger than the angle formed between theoptical axis of the second illumination element and the optical axis ofthe imaging optical system. The illumination range of the firstillumination element is narrower than the illumination range of thesecond illumination element. In other words, the illumination range ofthe illumination element is made narrower as the angle is larger betweenthe optical axis of the illumination element and the optical axis of theimaging optical system.

The illumination controller changes the optical axis direction of theilluminator by controlling the orientation of the illuminator. The angleformed between the optical axis of the first illumination element andthe optical axis of the imaging optical system may be different from theangle formed between the optical axis of the second illumination elementand the optical axis of the imaging optical system. The illuminationcontroller changes the optical axis direction (effective optical axisdirection) of the illuminator by controlling the ratio between thecurrent flowing through the first illumination element and the currentflowing through the second illumination element.

Each embodiment can provide an imaging apparatus and a monitoringsystem, each of which can improve the captured image quality by reducingthe uneven luminance distribution of the object in the tilt imagingusing the illuminator.

While the present invention has been described with reference toexemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is notlimited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of thefollowing claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as toencompass all such modifications and equivalent structures andfunctions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No.2018-142871, filed on Jul. 30, 2018, which is hereby incorporated byreference herein in its entirety.

1-16. (canceled)
 17. An imaging apparatus comprising: an image sensor;an angle controlling unit configured to change an angle between a planeorthogonal to an optical axis of an imaging optical system and animaging plane of the image sensor; an illumination unit; and anillumination controlling unit configured to change an illumination rangeof the illumination unit based on the angle.
 18. The imaging apparatusaccording to claim 17, wherein the illumination unit includes a firstillumination element and a second illumination element having differentillumination ranges.
 19. The imaging apparatus according to claim 18,wherein the illumination controlling unit controls the illuminationrange of the first illumination element and the illumination range ofthe second illumination element by controlling a current flowing throughthe first illumination element and a current flowing through the secondillumination element.
 20. The imaging apparatus according to claim 18,wherein the illumination controlling unit controls the illuminationrange of the first illumination element and the illumination range ofthe second illumination element based on a ratio between a currentflowing through the first illumination element and a current flowingthrough the second illumination element.
 21. The imaging apparatusaccording to claim 18, wherein an angle between an optical axis of thefirst illumination element and the optical axis of the imaging opticalsystem is larger than an angle between an optical axis of the secondillumination element and the optical axis of the imaging optical system,and wherein the illumination range of the first illumination element isnarrower than the illumination range of the second illumination element.22. The imaging apparatus according to claim 17, wherein theillumination unit includes a first illumination element for illuminatinga first region where a distance from the first illumination element is afirst distance, and a second illumination element for illuminating asecond region where a distance from the second illumination element is asecond distance longer than the first distance, wherein the first regionand the second region are on a focus plane determined based on theangle, wherein the illumination controlling unit controls so that acurrent flowing through the second illumination element is larger than acurrent flowing through the first illumination element.
 23. A controlmethod of an imaging apparatus comprising the steps of: changing anangle between a plane orthogonal to an optical axis of an imagingoptical system and an imaging plane of an image sensor; changing anillumination range of an illumination unit based on the angle.
 24. Anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program forcausing a computer to execute a control method of an imaging apparatus,the method comprising the steps of: changing an angle between a planeorthogonal to an optical axis of an imaging optical system and animaging plane of an image sensor; changing an illumination range of anillumination unit based on the angle.